The YAML-LD Test Suite is a set of tests that can be used to verify YAML-LD Processor conformance to the set of specifications that constitute YAML-LD. The goal of the suite is to provide an easy and comprehensive YAML-LD testing solution for developers creating YAML-LD Processors.
More information and an RDFS definition of the test vocabulary can be found at vocab.
Tests are driven from top-level manifest. Tests have input, expected and may have context or frame documents.
Tests may have a expandContext
option, which is treated
as an IRI relative to the manifest.
The expected results with file extension .jsonld
or .yamlld
can be compared using YAML-LD object comparison with the processor output. Additionally, if the ordered
option is not set, the result should be expanded and compared with the expanded expected document also using YAML-LD object comparison.
Test results that include a context input presume that the context is provided locally, and not from the referenced location, thus the results will include the content of the context file, rather than a reference.
Tests of type jld:ToRDFTest
have an expected file extension of .nq
. Their results can be compared using RDF Dataset Isomorphism.
A PositiveSyntaxTest looks specifically for syntax-related issues. A PositiveSyntaxTest succeeds when no error is found when processing.
A NegativeEvaluationTests looks for a string value in expectedErrorCode, representing the error code resulting from running the test.
Similar to JSON-LD object comparison.
If algorithms are invoked with the ordered
flag set to true
, simple JSON Object comparison may be used, as the order of all arrays will be preserved (except for fromRdf, unless the input quads are also ordered). If ordered
is false
, then the following algorithm will ensure arrays other than values of @list
are compared without regard to order.
YAML-LD object comparison recursively compares JSON objects, arrays, and values for equality.
@list
). Each item within the array must be equivalent to an item in the array being compared to by recursively using the comparison algorithm. For values of @list
, the order of these items is significant.@language
, and other places where language tags may be used, are specified in lowercase in the test results. Implementations should either normalize language tags for testing purposes, or compare language tags in a case-independent way.Note that some tests require re-expansion and comparison, as list values may exist as values of properties that have @container: @list
and the comparison algorithm will not consider ordering significant.
The following properties are treated as if they are defined in the JSON-LD Test Vocabulary, but are not yet defined.
expectRE
: One or more regular expressions used on a PositiveSyntax
. In addition to parsing properly, the result must match all listed regular expressions.req
: The type of requirement, one of must, should, or may. If unspecified, the normative statement being tested is taken as must.The top-level manifest references each test associated with a particular type of behavior.
Implementations create their own infrastructure for running the test suite. In particular, the following should be considered:
application/ld+json
for .jsonld
application/ld+yaml
for .yamlld
application/n-quads
for .nq
contentType
option.@list
. (This may be difficult for compacted results, where array value ordering is dependent on the associated term definition).useJCS
option.requires
property, indicating some optional behavior described by a test vocabulary term.The HTML versions of the test manifests are built using the Node action npm run generate
, which also cross-indexes tests with references from the specification.
If you would like to contribute a new test or a fix to an existing test, please follow these steps:
Distributed under the W3C Test Suite License. To contribute to a W3C Test Suite, see the policies and contribution forms.
UNDER THE EXCLUSIVE LICENSE, THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL DOCUMENTS, TESTS AND SOFTWARE THAT LINK THIS STATEMENT ARE PROVIDED “AS IS,” AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, OR TITLE; THAT THE CONTENTS OF THE DOCUMENT ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE; NOR THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH CONTENTS WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY THIRD PARTY PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS OR OTHER RIGHTS. COPYRIGHT HOLDERS WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF ANY USE OF THE DOCUMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONTENTS THEREOF.